Today I would like to continue YX Precious Medeal Berhad’s work, even though I have completed the paperwork actually, there is still work to do, technically to say it is still not complete, as there are some documents that we are still pending from clients, and we are unable to proceed if we didn't receive these document from the client. Moreover, there are some things I am unsure and Ili told me to jot them down first, then she will ask the client to clarify. Below are the questions I would like to ask the client.
For the current year, there is also no new review being made to the IT policy? As according to last year's management letter, the client replied that they will review it.
For the current year, there is no SOP being made for the practices? According to last year's management letter, the client replied that they will partially prepare for it, which are:
Did the client perform a user access review for AutoCount this year? As per last year's management letter, the client replied that they will work out it, but accordion to the evidence given, we can not find any respective documentation.
Did the client set up the test environment for AutoCount? The evidence given is only for Pronto and what was mentioned in last year's management letter is the client will engage with the vendor to set up the test environment.
Another task I need to do today is regarding the Envictus, remember that we have conducted a meeting with the client to present them with what we found out after the JV test, then today client have send us the amended general ledgers and trial balance. In the email, the client also mentioned the trial balance that she gave us the first time was wrong as the date is not the opening date. I then use the remaining time to run again the JV test for Envictus.
Main things that have learned
-For the YX Precious Medal Berhad, jot down the question that needs to ask the client
-Redo Envictus JV test
Comment/idea/opinion One thing I learned today is when you noticed the general ledger or the trial balance client gave is questionable, you should not proceed to the next step but need to point it out to the client and clarify with the client first, if not it is a waste of time to proceed the data if the data itself is incorrect.
Comments